Unit 1 Portfolio
Four Creative Spins on Old and New Technology
Cleaner for your Hair- and the Earth-National Geographic's encouragement of shampoo bars
National Geographic is a source that is known for nature advocacy and education of our planet. So, you could imagine my surprise when I clicked on an article that was focused around beauty products. However, once I got reading, I found the article was educating on the innovation of shampoo, the shampoo bar, and why everyone should be a convert. The short and simple article highlights how shampoo bars reduce plastic, last longer than a bottle, and are often qualified to be natural and cruelty free. Not to mention how "TSA isn't going to take soap that's in bar form and a shampoo bar won't ruin your clothes." Overall the article remarks on the handful of good outcomes that the shampoo bar will bring you, your luggage, and the earth, including their recommendations of which to use and why.
Examining the article itself, I found National Geographic made this text very informative in a rather 'quick and dirty' manner. The format was laid out with clear headers, and the information was relayed in an impressively short manner. The diction was very convincing with its optimistic tone. I really enjoyed seeing a highly acclaimed organization make an eco- friendly advocacy article accessible and easy to the eye.
A Modern Perspective on Dated Technology A Times article on a NYC pencil shop
Today’s generation is fully immersed in digital technology, leaving the perception that the past technique of writing with pencils is no longer impactful. However, a store in lower Manhattan combats this digital immersion, bringing back the pencil in a way that even the newest generations can come to appreciate. Ms. Weaver, who tends to the shop, revealed how there’s a different pencil for everyone, from crossword puzzle pencils with pointy erasers, to authentic graphite pencils from the 1950’s. Whatever the need is, this store has a way of bringing the past into the future, with an aesthetic that “is begging to be Instagrammed” as says so on the website.
Examining the article itself, the New York Times did a really nice job curating a feeling of connection that made me want to buy a pencil. It touched on many different passions and everyday tasks correlating each thing with a specific pencil, which made it seem like buying a pencil in the shop would be an act of supporting yourself and helping yourself grow in the area of choice. The relaxed diction gave a casual, easy feeling to the article, making it a pleasant read. I am surprised and happy to say that this article made me feel connected to past technology in a modern way.
Killing Two Harmful Birds with One Stone -BBC's optimistic story on innovative energy
Looking at climate change and carbon emissions in the air is often seen as something negative and troubling on our planet. However, as destruction is being done, there are also bright minds talking about restoration- this one in particular being a startup called Charm Industrial, where they are troubleshooting two urgent concerns at once. The small California company has created new technology that takes the dead trees and brush from California forest and heats it up in a zero-oxygen chamber, creating oil that they can then put back into the earth. But the oil does more than temporarily rebalancing the earth, as Co-founder Kelly Kinetic explains: “It’s really valuable for its carbon content, and not necessarily its energy content”. This makes it unique in that there will be no desire to re-drill it, leaving the startup with major potential of slowing down the destruction of the earth in more ways than one.
The idea of creating new technology to help the planet is exciting- it gives those with a concern a chance to feel optimistic. However, Charm industrial is one of many companies with a good idea that has a barrier of expense, making this story seem a bit misleading; the optimistic beginning of the innovative technology was destroyed towards the end of the video, as the BBC spared the gory details of how difficult it would be for the company to make a real impact on the earth for the last few minutes. This being said, I think the BBC did a nice job showing the potential the company had, and explained it in a manner that was easy to conceptualize. Unfortunately, the steps of implementing technology make this story one that is unsuccessful at the moment, and I think going in with that information in the beginning would've made it a more informative video.
Looking at the Eco- Friendly Bright Side-The Economist’s article on solar power
This article on new environmental technology was very well written. Even though I went in with a background of knowing a fair amount about solar power, the article took the time to help the viewer understand different types of solar power, how they work, and where they are currently being used. After an extensive backstory, the article formed a concise perspective of the pros and cons of solar power from an overarching view. My only critique for the article, and I mean the only, would be the extensive explanation versus real world applications. I would've liked to hear more about the energy use than the science behind it, though the overall intention of the article was concise, making it an informative read.
Amanda Kearns- Unit 1




I think your second source (BBC video) is good. One thing you could possibly add is more description on what it was like watching/taking in the video. What was the experience like for the viewer. In what ways did the creator address or speak to their audience? - Anders
ReplyDeleteHi Anders,
DeleteI appreciate the feedback and definitely though it was helpful in improving my blog. I think reflecting specifically on how the video effected me was important for the overall reflection on my blog, and made it more personalized. It's always interesting to get the straight facts and then experience and see how the information effected the reviewer, so it made sense for me to do this so others could have a better experience reading the blog.
On your 3rd source, I think you have a good opportunity to include some sort of quote from the article. At the end of your first paragraph, when you are talking about how governments around the world pushed for the use of solar energy and how despite this fossil fuels were often still more cost effective. I think a quote here would really strengthen this argument. - Anders
ReplyDeleteThis looks good so far. I would recommend including some quotes and/ or photos to your analyses to support them and add visuals. I think you wrap up each analysis really well, and I think adding quotes will help you to make each analysis a little longer. -Lauren
ReplyDeleteI really like how your final blog turned out. It was great to see the changes you made from your draft as well as how it all came together to a concise and complete project. - Anders
ReplyDelete